Despite rapid channel proliferation (and expense growth), most transactions still happen in the branch—even when other channels can serve customer needs better. As cost pressures build, encouraging better use of non-branch channels will become a business mandate. But many customers will not readily embrace this change. Some may actively protest. However, as our recent channel preference analysis reveals, three barriers stand in the way of migrating transactions and relationships to multichannel models.
1) Inexperience: Customers have not been effectively educated on their options. As the above graphic shows, over 30% of customers have no experience performing basic banking tasks outside the branch. Increasing education and experience is the quickest and least expensive path to migration and more efficient use of channels. As one of our recent case studies shows, customer education through the branch is central to driving activity and transactions online.
2) Inequality: The quality of online offerings still lags the branch: Many banks are focused on simply replicating and accelerating branch capabilities through non-branch channels. Instead, banks need to focus on creating compelling experiences based on the unique strengths of the web. Until remote channels can deliver more compelling emotional resonance with customers, banks will not see sustained growth in that direction.
3) Indifference: In some cases, personal preference will trump qualitative assessment (or, my grandmother will never bank online): Personal preference is a good news-bad news situation for banks. The bad news is that some customers, no matter how high the quality of non-branch channels or how extensive the education around their capabilities, will never leave the branch. Further bad news is that these customers are likely not to be very profitable. The good news: in our survey, this group constitutes only about 10% of respondents.
For more on the results of our channel preference survey and how customers are making channel decisions, members can download our recent study, “Channel Strategy: Replacing Consistency with Quality.”

Each quarter, CFC surveys nearly 20,000 consumers around the globe on their financial sentiments, product satisfaction, confidence in financial institutions, and overall engagement with their finances. All of our
In their aim to give customers the convenience to transact and purchase where they wish, banks have successfully expanded functional capabilities to additional channels. Indeed most customers see little difference between the branch and online channels for key banking tasks, and many customers have migrated away from the branch.
As we highlighted in our blog 
At a time when banks can least afford to lose key customers, a growing field of non-bank financial service providers is redefining customer experience. What threat do disruptive innovators pose to banks—and more importantly, what can banks learn from new models?
The mass affluent account for more than 16% of households, more than 48% of global assets under management, and represent a key battleground for growth. But it is time for the industry to question its assumptions about the needs and behaviors of this important
Each quarter, CFC surveys nearly 20,000 consumers around the globe on their financial sentiments, product satisfaction, confidence in financial institutions, and overall engagement with their finances.
As the retail banking industry copes with reduced core banking margins, unprecedented low loan demand, negative consumer sentiments, and abundant technology growth, banks see their profits deteriorating. Retail banks are under pressure to simultaneously boost productivity while reducing sales expense in order to restore business health.